01One traceable product configuration
Establish the approved baseline
Capture the exact game, software, math, paytable, artwork, and configuration previously evaluated in Nevada.
Product overview · About 90 seconds
From prior approval to a focused jurisdictional plan
Follow a fictional Nevada-approved game as it is prepared for a New Jersey submission. This public overview shows the outcome without exposing proprietary regulatory intelligence.
Fictional product
Desert Fortune 1.0.3
Nevada → New Jersey
3
Reusable
3
Documentation
2
Targeted tests
1
Product review
Outcome: ask the lab to price the unresolved items—not reconstruct the entire approval history.
The workflow
Four decisions that change the submission conversation
02Requirement-by-requirement crosswalk
Compare destination requirements
Map the fabricated New Jersey requirement set to the approved Nevada evidence without exposing the underlying regulatory library or matching logic.
03A focused supplemental scope
Separate reuse from new work
Organize each item into reusable evidence, documentation, targeted testing, or potential product change—subject to human review.
04Submission-ready evidence index
Prepare a stronger submission
Package citations, gaps, review decisions, and proposed actions into a clear plan for internal teams and the independent laboratory.
Before
“What do we need for New Jersey?”
An open-ended request that invites the lab to rediscover prior work and define the scope.
With Game Approval
“Here are the mapped differences and proposed actions.”
A documented starting point that separates evidence reuse from genuinely new documentation, testing, or product work.
Personalized demonstration
Bring your source jurisdiction and destination market.
We will tailor the conversation to your submission volume, evidence library, target jurisdictions, and current approval workflow.
Request a live demo